<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Be Smart: I&#8217;m no standards expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hughroper.com/journal/?feed=rss2&#038;p=268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hughroper.com/journal/?p=268</link>
	<description>Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 22:46:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim Siever</title>
		<link>http://www.hughroper.com/journal/?p=268&#038;cpage=1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Siever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 17:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughroper.com/journal/?p=268#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Hugh,

I did read Eric&#039;s post. I read it the day it was published. I am not sure why you assume I have not read it.

I specifically praised them for not using a table-based design and for using a doctype. I also specifically noted that they were moving in the right direction.

At the same time, I am not going to ignore what is wrong with the new design. Nor am I going to ignore an opportunity—should the Church designers ever come across the post—to educate others on semantic design and declaring background colour.

I could have been much more harsh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh,</p>
<p>I did read Eric&#8217;s post. I read it the day it was published. I am not sure why you assume I have not read it.</p>
<p>I specifically praised them for not using a table-based design and for using a doctype. I also specifically noted that they were moving in the right direction.</p>
<p>At the same time, I am not going to ignore what is wrong with the new design. Nor am I going to ignore an opportunity—should the Church designers ever come across the post—to educate others on semantic design and declaring background colour.</p>
<p>I could have been much more harsh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.hughroper.com/journal/?p=268&#038;cpage=1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 15:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughroper.com/journal/?p=268#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Kim, you should really read Eric&#039;s post on the new Microsoft home page. That is what my post is really about. &quot;This is a time to encourage them to continue, not give them ample reason to reverse course.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim, you should really read Eric&#8217;s post on the new Microsoft home page. That is what my post is really about. &#8220;This is a time to encourage them to continue, not give them ample reason to reverse course.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Siever</title>
		<link>http://www.hughroper.com/journal/?p=268&#038;cpage=1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Siever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 04:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hughroper.com/journal/?p=268#comment-55</guid>
		<description>A little harsh? Crap. That&#039;s what I get for holding back and trying to say good things (e.g. using a doctype, getting rid of tables).

Net time I won&#039;t hold back.

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little harsh? Crap. That&#8217;s what I get for holding back and trying to say good things (e.g. using a doctype, getting rid of tables).</p>
<p>Net time I won&#8217;t hold back.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.hughroper.com/journal/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
